jump to navigation

Game design inspiration December 29, 2008

Posted by townsend51 in Japan, character design, design, ma.k, modelling.
1 comment so far

I’ve been paying even more attention than usual to game and character design of late, because I’m working on a game of my own: Project Utopia (see previous post).

One thing that I stumbled upon was MA.C. I’d never heard of it before, even though I’ve been a fan of model making (particularly Games Workshop stuff) for a long time. Let me just say that these are some of the best models you will ever see!

Here is a great fan site: maschinenkrueger.com

Be sure to check out the packaging design as well, because it is also top knotch:

Sadly, it isn’t widely available in the UK, so pictures will have to suffice. But rest assured, there’s a vibrant modelling community who’ve documented their builds, and a lot of these can be found on Flikr or the aforementioned sites.

Project Utopia December 29, 2008

Posted by townsend51 in card design, ccg, dragstarr games, police, project utopia.
add a comment

I’ve been working on a new card game called Project Utopia, and I’m pleased to unveil one of the first cards!

Dragstarr games is the official site, and it will be seeing some serious updates in the next couple of weeks. We’re very excited about Project Utopia, because there hasn’t been many great CCGs around for a while now, and hopefully this can plug the gap.

If anybody has any questions then I’d only be too happy to answer them.

The Environmental Value of Design December 29, 2008

Posted by townsend51 in design, ecological, environmentally friendly, macbook, products, throw away.
add a comment

This point has been touched upon by many design commentators, but it’s worth reiterating here, purely because it makes a lot of sense, and helps to frame the social responsibilities and importance of designers.

If something is well designed, then it will have an enduring appeal, which should encourage its long term use. If you like it’s the antithesis of throw away products, which can be highly environmentally damaging, if only because of their high volume.

So it isn’t strictly necessary to design with the typical environmentally friendly materials to make an environmentally friendly design. If something is designed for enduring appeal, and not to satiate some passing fad, then it will inherently be environmentally friendly.

Apple have the led the way somewhat with the new Macbook, which has a chassis which is milled from a single block of aluminium. Not only is it aesthetically pleasing, but at the end of its life (which is likely to be much longer than the average PC) it is easily recyclable. And of course, fewer parts means less energy consumed in its production.

But this still isn’t enough. If design such as this isn’t affordable to the vast majority, then it can’t hope to make any significant contributions to reductions in environmentally damaging waste. Hopefully these good practices will filter through to more mass market manufacturers. Their products may be less throw-away, but this doesn’t mean that they’ll sell less. A well designed product is more likely to see robust sales for a longer period of time, which maximises their return on investment.

It makes economic and environmental sense, so why isn’t everyone doing it? Well I think that things are beginnning to change, and consumer preferences will soon veer away from throw away products. This would be a fantastic victory for design, and the environment, because what ever way you look at it, the two are very closely twinned in this day and age.

The British Automotive Industry December 24, 2008

Posted by townsend51 in UK, bailout, car industry, credit crunch, government, jaguar, landrover, recession.
add a comment

Jaguar Landrover has just requested a £667 million loan from the British Government in order to continue operations in the current dire economic climate. I’ve spoken to a number of people on the matter, and what emerged was two wholly divergent opinions. One was that they should receive no support whatsoever. And the other was that not only was a support package a good idea, it was nothing more than common sense.

I will examine each in turn, but first lets consider why the automotive industry has found itself in such a difficult position.

Car production is a high volume, low margin business, in common with other highly commoditised products. But unlike other sectors, where premium products enjoy much healthier margins than their cheaper, less sophisticated counterparts, cars are always low margin. Porsche enjoy the greatest margins at around 8%, but most other manufacturers border around the 2-5% mark. In order to make such a business work, the volumes have to be tremendous, and lets not forget, we’re talking about expensive products here. When demand drops, the profitibility is disproportionally affected, because unless the producer can maintain economies of scale, the margins are negligible. This is why many factories close down for short periods, because it makes no sense to keep them open unless they’re running at near to maximum capacity.

But this ’survival mode’ also incurrs costs, without offering anything in the way of profitability. Unless a manufacturer is sitting on huge cash reserves, this might not even be a choice, and even if it is, it can only last for so long.

This is where Jaguar Landrover come in. Their core markets have been heavily hit by the credit crunch, and they certainly aren’t cash rich.

The Government could be accused of showing favouritism by backing the car industry, whilst ignoring other areas of the economy which are struggling; but the car industry is important. It employs close to a million people in the UK in directly related activities. And in turn, the wealth generated helps to support local communities, and other businesses. If those jobs were to disappear, then there’d be a huge rise in unemployment benefit claims in the short term. And once manufacturing jobs are lost to lower cost economies they will never return: the seed capital required, and prohibitive planning laws, would make it impossible. The largest growth area in the UK economy is the creative sector, but there’s no way that it could absorb thousands of new workers. Indeed, nothing short of a bold new power plant build program would come close to providing enough skilled jobs.

On the other hand, £667 million is a lot of money, and at recent profitibility levels, it is unlikely that Jaguar Landrover will ever be able to pay it back, even at low interest. And the days of state owned British Leyland are long gone: the Government is under no obligation to financially support private enterprise. Some may argue that the money would be better spent elsewhere, or indeed not spent at all.

Just a final word on Jaguar Landrover as a company. It isn’t gross mismanagement that has led them in to this situation. Even Toyota reported a loss for the first time in 70 years. These are exceptional times, and any decisions should be treated as such. I just hope that any action is decisive, and that it comes before it’s too late.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/transport/3900248/Jaguar-bail-out-must-come-in-days-not-weeks-warns-union.html

A brief history of motorbike design December 23, 2008

Posted by townsend51 in bmw, design, history, motorbike, motorcycle, triumph.
add a comment

Dieter Rams December 11, 2008

Posted by townsend51 in braun, design, dieter rams, vimeo.
add a comment

Here is a very interesting, and well executed video about Dieter Rams, the iconic designer for Braun, the electrical goods manufacturer:

Dieter Rams, designer – Cold War Modern from Victoria & Albert Museum on Vimeo.

It is very difficult to ignore his influence on design, and perhaps the best measure of his enduring relevance is just how modern his work still looks, even though some of it is almost half a century old.